Commons:Deletion requests/File:White sand beach, Boracay Island - panoramio (1).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:White sand beach, Boracay Island - panoramio (1).jpg

The file is an image of a sand castle on Boracay Island, the Philippines, dated March 2016, and it's design is likely over the threshold of originality. As there are no FOP in the Philippines per COM:FOP Philippines, the file is likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Even sand castles?! How about this - File:I love Boracay.jpg (found at Category:Boracay), @廣九直通車: ? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: I think sand castles can be regarded as "sculptures made by sand", and we'll need more information on Filipino threshold of originality to determine the status of File:I love Boracay.jpg, as that sand castle only consists of various characters, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@廣九直通車: regretably, there is no mention of Filipino TOO at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines, and unfortunately there are no real life case rulings applicable for the works at (g) clause in our copyright law ("Works of drawing, painting, architecture, sculpture, engraving, lithography or other works of art; models or designs for works of art"). TOO can a point of contention in the Philippines, I admit, but much of us (here in the Philippines) always ignore the concept of TOO in terms of freedom of panorama, given the fact that there is, sadly, no freedom of panorama in our country. A recent development on Philippine FOP is that IPOPHL is considering FOP as one of the possible insertions or amendments for the ongoing review of the copyright law. For TOO, I admit I'm  Unsure, with no references to find that there is recognized TOO with respect to copyrighted artworks in the Philippines. It seems that this situation is analogous to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 5. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

And by the way, once we established that that sand castle in this image exceeds TOO, Section 172.2 of the Intellectual Property Code provides that it is eligible for copyright protection regardless of mode or form of expression.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Update @廣九直通車: see w:Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#Some points from the dialogue for the main points of the dialogue last Feb. 10. Threshold of originality concept was not addressed, however, though it has been established that ideas are not copyrighted, but expressions of ideas are. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

• Delete due to lack of FOP in the Phillipines. SHB2000 (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)