Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/test set nom

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

test set nom[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2019 at 06:58:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • The files in a set are all displayed in the normal galleries. The set designation is just for the nomination, after that all the files included are treated as normal FPs. Example: The two images in this set are stored/displayed at Commons:Featured pictures/Objects. My guess it that you will not be able to automate this since the process is far to complicated. The set nom is placed in the log and chronological, not visible in Commons:Featured pictures, list and then the files are extracted manually to be labled with the assessment and placed in the right gallery. --Cart (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @W.carter: , any example where the set had images from different categories ?? Eatcha (talk) 16:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Not that I can think of. The idea with a set is that the images belong together and that usually means that they belong in the same category. --Cart (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Yes, I think any set that required different categories would fail the set criteria. I think that if images in a set could stand alone, treat them as normal FPs, but in some cases special handling would be required for the gallery. For instance, it's something like a 5 x 8 mosaic scan of a very large painting, it would be better to just have a downsampled version of the full painting in the gallery. -- King of ♠ 02:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination This nomination will be archived by the bot —— Eatcha (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]