Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU • COM:ANI

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

Note

  • Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
  • Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

Saka iran (talk · contribs)[edit]

This user was banned before for uploading more than a dozen copyvio files (Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 36#Saka iran (talk · contribs)) and now they are continuing to do the same. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for 3 months. Yann (talk) 10:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@HeminKurdistan: They were blocked. See their block log. Note that we don't have a Commons:Banning policy.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dasnusantara[edit]

Dasnusantara (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Hi, This user uploaded maps from several websites claiming they are made by the government of Indonesia. However I can't see the evidence, and I have some doubt seeing the history of copyright violations. Could someone check please? Knowledge of the local language may help. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Rahmanibnusaid[edit]

Rahmanibnusaid (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

Uploading copyvios after final warning. – Pbrks (t • c) 21:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 21:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:John hit65[edit]

Repeatedly uploading files and logos under copyrights, despite repeated warnings about a possible block, even by admins themselves. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. One week block, all uploads are deleted as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shxahxh[edit]

108.58.166.134 13:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done No upload, or any other edit since April 2020. Yann (talk) 13:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FotoSV[edit]

It is clear the user @FotoSV works for the presidency of El Salvador and uploads pictures used for promotion purposes (I would dare say propaganda). I'd appreciate other users' input here. Thanks! TanookiKoopa (talk) 13:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I don't see any issue here, as long as the images are truly under a free license, and that the descriptions are factual, i.e. File:R'Bonney Nola Gabriel y Nayib Bukele.jpg. Yann (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@TanookiKoopa: Commons isn't enwiki, we don't require disclosure of paid content, nor is COM:NPOV a policy. As long as they are uploading useful images with no copyright issues, it's fine. —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good to know. Thanks!
TanookiKoopa (talk) 20:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Alone GTO $$$[edit]

Alone GTO $$$ (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) New copyvios after several warnings. Komarof (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Final warning was issued 10:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jeff G., and what? See uploads and deletions after that warning: Special:Log/Alone_GTO_$$$. --Komarof (talk) 08:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Blocked for a week. Copyvios already deleted. Yann (talk) 08:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Komarof: When reported uploaders remove evidence of their warnings from their user talk pages and I find such evidence anyway, I have started to report that evidence to save Admins and other users the trouble, as a public service.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Kallerna[edit]

This is to ask for review recent (sysop) actions by Kallerna.

a) I had blocked Karelj for a duration of 3 days for uncivil comments. Latest was this one, which comes as very disrespectful towards the photographer, however Karelj is well known for other disrespectful FPC "reviews" such as this one, for which I already had warned him, which he opted to ignore completely.

b) Several users agreed on obvious incivility of such comments, such as: Aristeas, SHB2000, XRay, Radomianin.

c) Nonetheless, Kallerna came "out of nothing" and unblocked the user -- completely out of process, without seeking any discussion, neither with me nor on Admins' noticeboard, also there wasn't even an unblock request on Karelj's talk page.

d) The unblock comment was "Groundless block [...] Silencing user who do not agree with you?", which I find libelous and uncivil, as neither did I ever discuss with Karelj in any sort of disagreement, nor did I vote or otherwise comment in the same FPC nomination whatsoever.

e) Similarly poor was their comment on my talk page ("Please do not block users who do not share the same views as you", etc.).

f) Further discussion on my talk page with Kallerna on this matter turned as useless.

g) Therefore, Kallerna's behaviour should be reviewed in terms of: 1) incivility -- due to false claim of myself blocking a user because of contentual disagreement; and 2) obvious violation of Commons:Blocking policy, in particular: "To avoid wheel warring, another administrator should lift a block only if there is consensus to do so, even if there is no clear consensus in favor of the original block".

The sysop Kallerna I'm going to notify on this thread.

Thanks --A.Savin 22:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

+1 to what A.Savin said. I also find Karelj's refusal to communicate a major red flag – not just for the above but also for "But the image here looks, like from child, who receivd his first photoaparate and learns, how to operate with it". Kallerna should have discussed this beforehand, instead of unilaterally unblocking and making spurious accusations. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am not going to get involved here, as I am already part of the discussions about incivility on that nomination page. I just wanted to make people aware that Kallerna is one of only 3 people opposing this FPC nomination (which has more than 20 support votes), so when judging the possibility of a conflict on interest one should consider this fact. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This – thanks for mentioning it, as that too hasn't been mentioned before. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, I agree that 1. Karelj's comments are quite rude, if not disrespectful, 2. Kallerna's unblock is out of process. If you don't agree with a block, please discuss it instead wheel warring. Yann (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Yann, thanks for your comments. I have explained my actions in the user talk pages of A.Savin and Karelj. There is also a lot of conversation about the possible rudeness of Karelj in the nom page. I reverted the block due to it being inadequat, as pointed by fellow admistrator Christian Ferrer. —kallerna (talk) 09:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kallerna: Would you also like to explain your possible conflict of interest as mentioned by Kritzolina above? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kallerna: I wouldn't have blocked Karelj at this point, but your hastily unblocking is nevertheless an issue. It sends the wrong message. Yann (talk) 12:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with you, I should have contacted another administrator here and let someone else revert the block. However, the user had been wrongfully blocked for two days at that point, so I did not want to wait any longer. —kallerna (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A showcase example how not to address a complaint about one's own behaviour. --A.Savin 14:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Kallerna, if you snarkily try to dodge attempting my question (or A.Savin's) by Dec 2, I will start a nomination to desysop you. Sysops need to be held accountable to their actions; not answering questions raised towards you about your potential misuse of tools is a red flag and is unsysop-like behaviour. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment I would support that. Kallerna is good photographer, but definitely not good for the sysop team. As a (possibly offtopic) side-note, look at their talk page (the QI promotions). They have uploaded masses of images of contemporary buildings in South Korea where there is no FoP. Many have been deleted already. A sysop should have at least a very basic knowledge what to upload on Commons and what not. Kallerna seems not to have this knowledge. And this arrogancy is the final straw. Thanks --A.Savin 13:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kallerna: courtesy ping – 2 days left to answer my/A.Savin's question before I will start a desysop nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
1 day left, Kallerna. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"Silencing user who do not agree with you" is clearly disrespectful, uncivil comment, especially given the fact that it's also false. Kallerna, you still didn't response how come that I'm "silencing users". This block log comment should be hidden at the very least. --A.Savin 13:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could a third admin please hide this comment? Thanks --A.Savin 14:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done I hid the edit summary. Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. --A.Savin 17:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@A.Savin, Kritzolina, Yann, and Abzeronow: Since it's December 2 and Kallerna did not respond, I started a desysop nomination which can be found at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Kallerna (de-adminship). Apologies in advance for any formatting errors (I'm new to this process). Pinging everyone involved in this discussion. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Максим6660[edit]

Максим6660 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) won't stop uploading fake/fantasy diagrams. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. User blocked and files deleted. --A.Savin 14:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Rahmanibnusaid again[edit]

Rahmanibnusaid (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

Uploading copvios after final warning and previous block. – Pbrks (t • c) 22:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for 1 week by Elcobbola. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done. I declined unblock request. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Jungan1104[edit]

Jungan1104 uploaded a number of copyrightable logos claiming to be licensed under CC license, but without any evidence of permission. Some were tagged Speedydelele by me and others, but he rolled back the tags several times to prevent them from being removed [1][2][3] and then vandalized my page[1]. What's more, in his reply, he portrayed himself as a victim and claimed he would create new account to get around any blocking of him [1].

In view of the above, his actions is contrary to the collaborative spirit and I felt it necessary to prevent him from uploading new files until he admitted his mistake. 0x0a (talk) 06:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not discussing university logos or game screenshots, but what I'm concerned about is the image of the satellite Set Top Box (digital satellite receiver) product. Why did you delete the photo? Why did you add the Copyvio tag to the Satellite Set Top Box product image? Even though the image I shared is not bound by copyright, the image should not be deleted. I uploaded the file just to complement the Wikipedia article entitled "Digital Video Broadcasting". Jungan1104 (talk) 07:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment I deleted the 2 files mentioned above, as obvious copyright violations. Yann (talk) 08:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jungan1104: Which filename is "the image of the satellite Set Top Box (digital satellite receiver) product"?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Perangkat receiver parabola.jpg Jungan1104 (talk) 00:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Convenience link: File:Perangkat receiver parabola.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 01:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Certainly not PD or free-licensed by the holder of the copyright on the packaging. Might be allowed on a fair use basis (non-free use) in some article where it was relevant on a Wikipedia that allows that, but that's not Commons' issue. - Jmabel ! talk 01:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:SialkotOfficialspoll[edit]

Please see Special:CentralAuth/SialkotOfficialspoll which shows cross Wiki abuse and sockpuppetry. Add to this uploads of uncertain parentage stated to be "Own work" and this appears to be an editor in need of sanctions. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. I warned the user, uploads are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Craqdi under a pseudonym[edit]

Hello Team,

It has been funny for a while, but the user Style Here has been reverting my action on Commons, and is obviously the troll Craqdi, as the account has been created one hour ago, when I proposed the file File:Craqdi.jpg for deletion, and per the conversation on my talk page [1]. Could you please block her? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is that abusive behavior okay with you? @CoffeeEngineer @CoffeeEngineer Style Here (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, Craqdi, that is why I asked for your blocking. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Style Here: Hello Craqdi, Nice to hear from you. Don't you have trans rights to support with your Vox political party of yours, or putting out horrible "music", or focussing on your porn carreer? CoffeeEngineer This treatment is unjustifiable and you support violence, please leave me I'm not a craqdi Style Here (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yilku1[edit]

For the last 8 months, this has repeatedly removed Category:Unidentified locations in Buenos Aires from this one photo.

No explanation was offered, even though pinged for it in the talk page, no geolocation or any other form of spatial identification was offered to justify the repeated uncategorization. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yilku1: What location in Buenos Aires is depicted in File:TranviaBsAs.jpg?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This photo is in Buenos Aires City, this is not an unidentified location. Yilku1 (talk) 15:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done. Yilku was made autopatroller on 11th of November. But (s)he has copyright problems (see his/her talkpage) and this removing "unidentified" templates problem as well, so I removed his/her autopatroller bit. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should I add back Category:Unidentified locations in Buenos Aires to that photo (and to any other in the same situation) now?, or would that be edit warring? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tuvalkin: So you just come here to report me first instead of just first leaving a comment in my discussion page? (i don't remember that ping, i do a lot of edits be more specific) Yilku1 (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You ignored my quaery to you on the file’s talk page after you repeatedly vandalized its categorization. You were reported here not too soon: Your absurd reply above (15:34) is all the proof I need that you’re either trolling or lacking competence, and I have neither time nor patience for either. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tuvalkin: Why do you accuse me like that? The photo was taken in Buenos Aires, is not an Unidentified location, and call me a troll for saying that? why? Maybe you vandalized the image after it is clearly not an Unidentified location and taken in Buenos Aires. Yilku1 (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, I’ll bite: what part of Category:Unidentified locations in Buenos Aires you don’t understand?
Please note that one of its parent cats is Category:Buenos Aires, which refers to the city itself, not to the surrounding (but not encompassing) Category:Buenos Aires Province — so this is not a case akin to, say, Category:Unidentified locations in São Paulo (state) versus Category:Unidentified locations in São Paulo city.
I suggest you either find out the location of this photo and add it to the file page (through specific categorization under Category:Streets in Buenos Aires and/or geolocation), if you know BA well enough, or else drop the stick and let others improve this filepage.
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So you are just going to spam the category to every image that doesn't have coordinates? Yilku1 (talk) 18:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yilku1: "Spam" is a rather unnecessary pejorative here, unless you think it would be appropriate to ask if you are "spamming" questions to this conversation. Buenos Aires is a large enough place that if there are no coordinates, no street address (or even an approximation to that), no indication of neighborhood, then it is appropriate to add Category:Unidentified locations in Buenos Aires. Have a look at Category:Unidentified locations in Seattle, Washington, for example. - Jmabel ! talk 22:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Replying to myself concerning the edit warring issue: Taivo already fixed it. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Craqdi again[edit]

Hello, Craqdi is back : Blujman and Azealia Amanda Banks. Could we please block it Yann? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 18:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Craqdi rebelote[edit]

Hello, Craqdi is back again : Global-Cats : block Yann? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Already blocked. Yann (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@CoffeeEngineer: Thanks for the reports. This is global lock evasion by Puxunito, reportable via m:srg.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jeff G.: Yes it is. Thanks for shqring this link with me, I am saving all its aliases. This is a long term problem already. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I opened https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global#Puxunito_again CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@CoffeeEngineer: You're welcome. I liked this redirect the best because it was all lower case and short, but m:sg is even shorter.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, I come from ca@wikimedia. It seems to me that this user has used offensive behavior and has already been blocked on Wikipedia in English and this is unacceptable. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CoffeeEngineer apart from deleting the edits from your page Turrar (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Elcobbola: FYI.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

fake license / copyright violation[edit]

this file «File:Negarenikdel.jpg» which up-loaded three times by user:حسام محمودی under fake license and copyright violation again up-loaded. user also had received warning previously. [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 17:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Last warning sent, files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Threats on my talk page[edit]

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Royal_Marsh?markasread=69630404&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#c-CoffeeEngineer-20231201012300-CoffeeEngineer-20231201012200 This user is slandering me and I believe he has a conflict of interest with another person. Royal Marsh (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@CoffeeEngineer: , this was entirely out of line. Yes, this was a sock account of a banned user: that doesn't mean you need to taunt or threaten them. Just go through the usual process and have the account blocked, as it ultimately was. - Jmabel ! talk 03:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jmabel Like, she gave so much info. It is crazy that in this day and age she gives so much data to find her. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 03:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@CoffeeEngineer: I'm not talking about the conduct of the now-blocked user. I'm talking about yours. The fact that someone's conduct here is bad does not entitle you to abuse them. We tolerate the occasional snide remark, but "You think you are smart by playing with us? I know a lot about you. This was too far. It is so easy to find you," is very close to a threat of physical harm. That is not OK. - Jmabel ! talk 04:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And, believe me, it's not like I'm never tempted. - Jmabel ! talk 04:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Craqdi again[edit]

Royal Marsh is Craqdi, Could we block it plase? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

? you came in insulting my discussion for no reason Royal Marsh (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Craqdi, Enough reasons. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, I don't know what you're talking about, but come on, I'll let you know.The person who came in to fight was you.I do not know what he says Royal Marsh (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
and more watching its discussion page on wikipedia in English it was blocked twice Royal Marsh (talk) 01:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Umbug CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
what do you mean? Royal Marsh (talk) 01:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't answer that Royal Marsh (talk) 01:57, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Elcobbola: FYI.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Tatiana Matlina[edit]

Tatiana Matlina (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  several misconducts right after one month incivility block expired: [2] [3] [4] Komarof (talk) 06:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I wouldn't call this "misconducts". This user can contest the deletion of her files, even if admins do not follow her. Yann (talk) 10:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To contest the deletion doesn't equal to call opponents liars and abusers. Komarof (talk) 11:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For her defense, in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina, I would say that, except for File:VERA Savina.jpg, there is no evidence of copyright violations. Copies mentioned elsewhere are not the sources of Commons files. @Tatiana Matlina: If the deleted files are really you own, could you please confirm the permission via COM:VRT, like it was done before? @Jameslwoodward, King of Hearts, and Taivo: Involved admins. Yann (talk) 11:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Edit conflict: Yann Re: no evidence of copyright violations. You've already changed your mind about File:VERA Savina.jpg, so please take a closer look at File:Viktar Markavets.jpg. --Komarof (talk) 11:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Where is the evidence? There is no copy of this outside Wikimedia. Yann (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Evidence of what? This is a derivative of the printed photo of person who died in 2013, uploaded as own work of 2016. Komarof (talk) 12:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So what? This is not an evidence. Where is the proof that Tatiana Matlina didn't take the original picture? Please read wikt:evidence. Yann (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please read COM:EVID before forcing me to prove anything, especially to prove that she couldn't make a photo of the dead person. And the uploader had plenty of time to provide proofs, but only insults followed. Komarof (talk) 13:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are confusing several things. Sure in case of doubt, the proof is on the uploader. But if the uploader is a user in good standing, and I think she is, the proof is somewhat reversed. Tatiana Matlina made 21,683 edits on Commons, quite a lot more than you, so you need to get down from you high horse. Yann (talk) 21:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will highly appreciate it if you tell me how many edits is enough so you can start insulting your opponents with impunity. In the whole batch of her [considerable] contributions, it is easy to notice two cameras, more than 99% of her photos made with. If for some reason she decided to mix in a dozen someone else’s works made with a dozen different cameras among hundreds of her own ones, it’s not my problem, and it’s not a tragedy. It was enough just not to turn it into a scandal. Iuppiter iratus ergo nefas - if she were right, she would have had explanations instead of insults. Komarof (talk) 22:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:حسام محمودی[edit]

The user in question is continuing to upload copyvio files after two warnings. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week, file deleted. Yann (talk) 10:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Umarxon III[edit]

Umarxon III (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  New copyvios after two blocks, including the 3-month one. Some files are re-uploaded after deletion: [5] [6] [7]. Komarof (talk) 12:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. One year block (third block). Taivo (talk) 18:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Graded roads[edit]

please, move such categories as I undestand, to Category:Gravel roads, because of d:Q5591881 Albedo (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&oldid=827006318"