User talk:CoffeeEngineer
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations[edit]
Hi, Please create a proper request. Do not add the category. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
File:ZIMG 1129AgentSmith.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Havang(nl) (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Areas.jpg[edit]
Votre proposition de changer le nom désemparé était, en principe, correcte. Mais l'image a un problème plus sérieux: son lien source est invalide et le champ auteur contient des erreurs, la paternité est donc inconnue. J'ai cherché des mots-clés en espagnol et examiné de nombreuses pages Web et PDF essayant de trouver la vraie source, en vain. En outre, certains sites Web s'appuient sur ce fichier sous Commons, à savoir: «areas.jpg», alors, à mon avis, il est préférable de ne rien faire à ce stade.
Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Rename[edit]
Hi CoffeeEngineer, As per Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed? #2 I can only move files from and to the same language, I cannot rename from Danish to English or Danish to French, It has to be Danish to Danish if that makes sense,
Unless you speak Danish then I would advise you stop adding rename requests for that image,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Cardboard ian curtis (2314288571).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Wrestlers[edit]
Just want to say that I appreciate your work in uploading the vintage wrestling pics and hope you continue. I've tried to put them in use wherever possible. LM2000 (talk) 07:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @LM2000: Hello LM2000, Thank you very much for your message. It is always a pleasure to get an acknowledgement for some work. There is still a lot to upload. I try to do my best. I appreciate that you can help me using this pictures as it is difficult to do both. I hope to get some news soon :-) . Have a nice day, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC) PS: I see that you did some prior and your rework on some images is amazing. I used the Terry Funk one in a Wikipédia article.
Tes imports sur Commons[edit]
Bonjour,
J'ai l'impression que tes imports sur Commons (qui sont des couvertures ou des articles de magazines qui sont ensuite découpés) sont litigieux et tendent vers le copyvio. Je vais demander à des administrateurs de se pencher dessus et de décider si on a le droit de faire cela ou non. N'y voit rien de personnel.Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Sismarinho: , je vais attendre l'avis des administrateurs et je n'uploaderai rien pour le moment. Au moins on sera clair sur le sujet. Bonne journée.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Sismarinho: , je ne vous en veux pas, bien au contraire, sinon, j'aurai continué. Après plus de 250 photos, il faut que je fasse le tri. On m'a induit en erreur en me disant que je pouvais. Cordialement, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#CoffeeEngineer
- PS: Existe-t-il un moyen pour qu'on communique par messages ou par chat pour aller plus vite dans la rédaction d'articles ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC) . Merci d'avance pour votre réponse !!!
- Je vais installer Discord sur mon ordi alors.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)PS : Pour des photos, il y a Flickr. Et pour les suppression massive il y a un outil (Perform batch task) dans bêta ou préférences (je patrouille un peu sur Commons de temps en temps).--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Sismarinho: Avant que je prenne peut-être Discord aussi, pourrai-je avoir votre avis sur les photos de Wrestling News venant de ce magazine qvec cette page (pas présente sur tous les magazines). Serait-ce quand mêle un copyvio ? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/f/fd/20190317142250%21Ivan_Koloff_-_AWA_Wrestling_-_n.59_1971_cover.jpg --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- "All photos sent become the property of Champion Sports Publishing Corporation." alors oui j'ai de très gros doutes. Après je ne suis pas une spécialiste en droits d'auteur.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Sismarinho: Je réussis à trouver des scans d'autres magazines. Il semble que AWA Wrestling n'avait pas de copyright en 1975 [[http://wrestlingscans.com/magazines/awa/146.pdf scan}} et en général les autres magazines n'en ont pas.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Sismarinho: Je les laisse faire, ils ont sûrement raison.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Sismarinho: Je réussis à trouver des scans d'autres magazines. Il semble que AWA Wrestling n'avait pas de copyright en 1975 [[http://wrestlingscans.com/magazines/awa/146.pdf scan}} et en général les autres magazines n'en ont pas.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Je vais installer Discord sur mon ordi alors.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)PS : Pour des photos, il y a Flickr. Et pour les suppression massive il y a un outil (Perform batch task) dans bêta ou préférences (je patrouille un peu sur Commons de temps en temps).--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- PS: Existe-t-il un moyen pour qu'on communique par messages ou par chat pour aller plus vite dans la rédaction d'articles ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC) . Merci d'avance pour votre réponse !!!
- Bonjour @Sismarinho: , je ne vous en veux pas, bien au contraire, sinon, j'aurai continué. Après plus de 250 photos, il faut que je fasse le tri. On m'a induit en erreur en me disant que je pouvais. Cordialement, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#CoffeeEngineer
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Jack Brisco, Buck Robley and Terry Funk - Inside Wrestling - December 1972 cover.jpg
- File:Pedro Morales vs Bruno Sammartino - Wrestling Monthly - January 1973 cover.jpg
- File:Dory Funk, Jr. and Jack Brisco - Wrestling Revue - April 1975 cover.jpg
- File:Bruno Sammartino Wrestler of the year - Wrestling Annual - n.11 1975 Magazine cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Dory Funk Jr. vs. Jack Brisco Match of the year - Wrestling Annual - n.11 1975 Magazine cover.jpg
- File:André the Giant and Édouard Carpentier - Wrestling Revue - December 1973 cover.jpg
- File:Chief Jay Strongbow - Inside Wrestling - February 1976 cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Ernie Ladd, André the Giant and Chief Jay Strongbow - Inside Wrestling - February 1976.jpg
- File:The Kangaroos - Wrestling Monthly Magazine - April 1972.jpg
- File:Complete cover - Inside Wrestling Magazine - November 1972 cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Blood! and brass knuckles - Inside Wrestling - November 1974 cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Dory Funk - Wrestling Revue - October 1973 - cover.jpg
- File:Ernie Ladd vs. Ox Baker - Inside Wrestling Magazine - August 1973 cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Chief Jay Strongbow - Inside Wrestling Magazine - August 1973 cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Bruno Sammartino vs. The Invader - Inside Wrestling Magazine - August 1973 cover.jpg
Yours sincerely, Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:The Crusher vs. Ray Stevens - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 Advertising (cropped).jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The Crusher vs. Ray Stevens - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 Advertising (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:The Crusher & Red Bastien standing in the ring - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 (cropped).jpg
- File:The Crusher & Red Bastien both signing autographs - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 Advertising (cropped).jpg
- File:Red Bastien and The Crusher signing autographs - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 Advertising (cropped).jpg
- File:The Big K and Bull Bullinski on the mat - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 (cropped).jpg
- File:Antonio Roca - THE WRESTLING NEWS MAGAZINE n.42 WWWF 1977 (cropped).jpg
- File:Bruno Sammartino - THE WRESTLING NEWS MAGAZINE n.42 WWWF 1977 (cropped).jpg
Crop or sourced to image since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Please consider creating a mass deletion request when appropriate in the future. -Mys_721tx (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:How mighty mites relax away from mat - Wrestling Revue - October 1973 - cover (cropped).jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:How mighty mites relax away from mat - Wrestling Revue - October 1973 - cover (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
originally sourced to image that has since been deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 17:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @BevinKacon: , If they are derivative from a deleted work, you can remove it. I am tired of discussing on why we have the right to keep it. Best regards, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi CoffeeEngineer,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
ƏXPLICIT 03:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Liste d'upload[edit]
Bonjour,
Puisque demain on commence un long weekend avec six samedi je te propose (si cela t'intéresse ainsi que la wXw) d'uploader une partie des photos posté sur Flickr par Photos N Effect.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Sismarinho: , J'espère que tu vas bien. Pour le long week-end, ce n'est pas vraiment mon cas, mais je veux bien aider. Y a-t-il des photos à uploader en priorité ? Aussi, on a un jour parlé d'un tchat privé du genre Discord, est-ce qu'il est mis en place ? --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer: moi j'ai installé Discord, mon identifiant est Sismarinho Catchopédien#1365. Tu m'ajoute comme ami et on pourra chatter. Enfin pour les photos c'est à voir au cas par cas (il y a déjà les ceintures de champion de la wXw, j'y ai vu Timothy Thatcher) mais je connais pas cette fédération ni ses catcheurs.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sismarinho: Bonjour, j'ai l'impression que Flickr to Commons ne marche pas correctement, voire pas du tout, je réessaierai un autre jour.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sismarinho: Bonjour, invitation envoyée--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC).
- @Sismarinho: Bonjour, j'ai l'impression que Flickr to Commons ne marche pas correctement, voire pas du tout, je réessaierai un autre jour.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer: moi j'ai installé Discord, mon identifiant est Sismarinho Catchopédien#1365. Tu m'ajoute comme ami et on pourra chatter. Enfin pour les photos c'est à voir au cas par cas (il y a déjà les ceintures de champion de la wXw, j'y ai vu Timothy Thatcher) mais je connais pas cette fédération ni ses catcheurs.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Transfering files to Commons[edit]
Hello!
Please tag the files on Wikipedia with {{subst:Now Commons}} when you transfer them to Commons, for example you transfered File:Mr. 450 with the Westside Mafia.jpg but en:File:Mr. 450 with the Westside Mafia.jpg isn't tagged with {{Now Commons}}.Jonteemil (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @Jonteemil: , I will do it in the future. Isn't it done automatically ? --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Héctor López Santillana at the Festival "De 2 a 3 Caídas" 2020.jpg[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Joe Weider in 1990 - 24 February 1990.jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Joe Weider in 1990 - 24 February 1990.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
sourced to file since deleted as copyvio Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Fautes d'orthographe?[edit]
Bonjour,
Tu as ajouté un certain nombre de fichiers dans Category:Spelling mistakes in French sur lesquels je ne vois pas de faute d'ortographe évidente : [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] etc. Quelles fautes d'ortographe étaient visées ? Place Clichy 12:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Place Clichy: . Ce sont principalement des fautes d'accent. Pour :
- [6] : Pot d'échappement, il manque l'accent,
- [7] : il manque l'accent circonflexe sur maître,
- [8] : accents manquant sur nécessaire, à et compréhension,
- [9] : il manque deux accents sur à l'aéroport
- [10] : Il manque des accents à république, bâtards et née.
- N'hésite pas à revenir vers moi si tu as des questions.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ce sont des inscriptions totalement en majuscule, non ? J'ai moi-même une préférence pour l'usage des accents sur les majuscules, mais je ne pense pas qu'on puisse qualifier leur courante omission comme une faute d'ortographe (ou spelling mistake, selon le nom anglais de cette catégorie). On pourrait plutôt la qualifier de graphie inélégante. Place Clichy 16:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Place Clichy: Je crois que j'ai commencé à les catégoriser de la sorte parce que j'ai vu des exemples similaires dans cette catégorie. Cependant, je comprends ton point de vue pour les majuscules, mais c'est une faute pour moi, surtout avec cet exemple où les accents sont utilisés de façon aléatoire [11]. Est-ce que tu sais si le cas a déjà été discuté ?
- Ce sont des inscriptions totalement en majuscule, non ? J'ai moi-même une préférence pour l'usage des accents sur les majuscules, mais je ne pense pas qu'on puisse qualifier leur courante omission comme une faute d'ortographe (ou spelling mistake, selon le nom anglais de cette catégorie). On pourrait plutôt la qualifier de graphie inélégante. Place Clichy 16:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
restauration d'un fichier supprimé par erreur[edit]
Bonjour je constate que vous avez supprimé ce fichier par erreur. Il n'ya pas d'infraction au droit d'auteur sur cette image, elle m'appartient. j'aimerais s'il vous plait que vous la restaurez. je vous ai également répondu à propos des autres photos que vous avez soumis à la communauté pour suppression. cordialement Paolaowono (talk) 09:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour Paolaowono, Mes demandes sont réfléchies et expliquées. Si c'est la pochette de l'album avec plusieurs chanteurs, il faudra prouver que vous avez le droit d'utiliser ces photos. Pour demander la restauration et la conservation des images, je vous invite à suivre les instructions sur cette page : [12]. Cependant, je ne retirerai pas mes demandes de suppression tant que la situation n'est pas mise au clair. J'espère que j'ai pu répondre à vos questions. Cordialement, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Please fix the license. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Yann, I am trying to clean up the Music category. It might be easier to do it in a bunch for all the musical album category once they are all identified, don't you think? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The files may or may not be in the public domain, so you need to check each time. This one seems to be old, although no date is specified, and it should be mentioned. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanations. I checked, and the singer died in 1947. I will update the information for this one, and check further in the future. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The files may or may not be in the public domain, so you need to check each time. This one seems to be old, although no date is specified, and it should be mentioned. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Deletion nominations for 'no proven notability'[edit]
Please stop nominating files for deletion in the basis of 'no proven notability'. Unlike on Wikipedia, notability is required on Commons. The closet equivalent is 'must be realistically useful for an educational purpose', see COM:EDUSE, which is less rigorous. Pictures of unidentified people in mundane locations do not normally pass this test, unless they are in use in any Wikimedia project, see COM:INUSE. In my view, pictures of established bands will almost always pass COM:EDUSE. However such pictures are often copyright violations, having been uploaded from the Internet by the band's fans. Any high-quality posed pictures of musicians taken from a viewpoint not accessible to an audience member should be regarded as suspect. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 01:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I do not aggree with you on several points. First of all, picture that are copyright violations must not be mixed, as reason for the upload of a picture can be multiple. Then, I do not aggree that all the bands have the same right to upload their picture on Commons. It makes finding useful pictures difficult and can easily be used for advertising. Also, I do that for months and i did not get any message from an administrator. Finally, I do not get how a random picture of a musicians without notability can be COM:EDUSE. I will see how I can ask for the deletion requests for notability. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I apologise for my delay in replying. I am not asserting that we should keep all content from all bands, but that the COM:EDUSE threshold for bands should be low. The precautionary principle does not apply. If a band or a musician is well-established then a photo of them may be useful for an article on the music scene where they are active, or on the venue where they have performed. High quality photos of performers are potentially useful even if the performers are unknowns. EDUSE is not restricted to potential use in Wikipedia, any file which might be used in a student's coursework qualifies.
- There is no problem with files that have been uploaded for the purpose of advertising, providing that they are realistically useful for an educational purpose, see COM:SPEEDY#G10. Commons should encourage such files. For example, the Welsh record label Sain uploaded a large number of music clips and album covers which are in Category:Sain (Records) Ltd. The record company's motivation may have been partly promotional, but several of these files are valuable and are in use in Wikipedia articles. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Category:Jîr Talat is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
|